Here is a quick comparison of various solutions to trigger ProcessFlow Integrator (PFI) flows:
Technique | Manual, Automatic, or Scheduled? | M3 modification free? |
M3 Java modification with MAK | Automatic | No |
Application Messages in CRS420 (for existing messages) | Automatic | Yes |
Application Messages in CRS420 (for new messages) | Automatic | No |
Script in Smart Office (old technique) | Manual | Yes |
Script in Smart Office (new technique) | Manual | Yes |
External Program Connector (EPC) | Automatic | Yes |
PF Scheduler | Scheduled | Yes |
URL (email, browser, XHR, Document Links, LSO Shortcuts, etc.) | Manual | Yes |
Mashup | Manual | Yes |
Field Audit Trail | Automatic | ??? |
Event Hub | Automatic | Yes |
3 thoughts on “Comparison of solutions to trigger PFI flows”